The citations stemmed from continuous violations that had been reported since the 1980s. Of these violations, the most damaging was an outside storage tank that leaked oil into a nearby stream. That violation has additional damages pending, as the EPA is putting together a plan for environmental remediation that is expected to cost $150,000. That cost will also be passed on to Sentry for reimbursement.

Frank & Dave’s Opinion of This Story:

What was the owner thinking? If you refuse to clean up your property for 30 straight years, you are definitely asking for trouble. In this case, the failure of the owner to address a leaking barrel of oil, which could have been removed for probably $100, has resulted in $150,000 in fines – if that even covers it. You can’t blame this on anybody but the park owner. We see this type of thing with mom and pop owners all the time, and all we can do is scratch our head and wonder how they can sleep at night.

The residents had filed a suit seeking more relocation money, as the park is being re-developed and all residents must move out. A City of Thousand Oaks ordinance that required higher amounts was removed after similar ordinances in other cities were struck down in court. The residents were suing to try and get the ordinance reinstated, despite the fact that case law showed it to be illegal.

The residents had a 90 day timeline to file the suit and serve the city, but failed to meet that deadline. As a result, the judge dismissed the suit.

Frank & Dave’s Opinion of This Story:

You’ve gotta love mobile home park residents. Not only is their lawsuit stupid- asking a court to reinstate an ordinance which the court has already found to be illegal- but they can’t even file it on time. Bet they probably wouldn’t have missed the deadline if it was for NASCAR tickets or a knife show- or just a sale on Budweiser.

First a quick history of how we got to this point. You probably remember all those ads a few years ago for 110% mortgages with no credit check? Or mortgage rates from 1%? Well, those didn’t exactly work out. In fact, as you probably already know, it resulted in the largest residential mortgage meltdown in U.S. history. Today, something like 25% of Americans are upside down in their mortgages. And around 10% of them are already in some form of default. Many of these borrowers are blaming the mortgage companies for leading them blindly into such a financial mess. Whether you buy onto that argument or not, it wasn’t hard for Washington to see this as a great political opportunity to show their extreme concern for the people (of course, not enough concern to actually do anything to fix those 25% of Americans who are upside down in their mortgages). So they came up with a terrific public relations concept: The Safe Act. This piece of legislation is supposed to protect all of us from the evil mortgage companies that seek only to enslave us into bad loans.

Here’s how it works. To enter into a mortgage, the individual doing the lending has to be licensed under the Safe Act. And they have to abide by certain covenants and restrictions on what they can and cannot lend on and how much they can charge. Somehow, this is going to stop mortgage abuse (kind of like how prohibition stopped drinking). The reality is that it causes all lenders to go through a pain-in-the-neck licensing process, pay about $1,000 in fees, and be subject to perpetual CPE classes.

Great, who cares? Well, if you sell mobile homes and carry the paper, then you better care, because you fall under the Act. While nobody knows for certain yet whether or not “rent-to-own” programs are included, the standard old sell and carry paper sure is. So you need to immediately contact your local Manufactured Housing Association and find out how the process works in your state. You do not, however, need to attend any expensive event to tell you about the Safe Act. Opportunists have popped up everywhere. You can get all the information you need for free from your state association.

Should you panic? No. First of all, the Act is so new, that many states have been able to buy time for it to actually take effect, so you may not already even be in default. Secondly, there will no doubt be a ton of lawsuits and case law to come, and the Act will probably morph into all kinds of things in the days ahead. But you need to know what’s going on, and if you need to begin the process to get licensed. Does everyone have to? No. If you sell no homes, or just rent homes, or sell homes for cash, then the Safe Act should have no effect on you. It only pertains to creating mortgages.

And there may be some help on the way. There is a huge push from the single-family housing industry to amend the Safe Act to not include any lender who is creating a mortgage on his own property. Apparently the geniuses in Washington forgot that there is a sizable market of individuals who buy stick-built housing and then sell and carry paper on them. And this credit market is among the few still making loans. So restricting the moms and pops of the world from creating home mortgages is a pretty stupid idea if the goal is to help keep home ownership within the grasp of many Americans. If the Safe Act was amended to exclude this group, and only focus on true mortgage companies who create loans on things they don’t own, then just about all mobile home park owners would be excluded from the law.

So don’t lose sleep over the Safe Act. Get the facts from your state manufactured housing association. Stay calm. Evaluate your position. Then act appropriately. If you only have a home or two to sell, maybe you should just sell them for cash and be done with it. You do have options.

And when it comes election time, you might remind your local candidate of how much you appreciate his hard work on the Safe Act – and kick him safely out of office!